Prenups are widespread abroad, but they are not welcome in India. First, there is a lot of social stigma around divorce. Such contracts also sound like a business conclusion and couples are uncomfortable entering into such agreements. Most of the time, people think that these agreements are reserved for rich people. But they`re much more common than that. A prenup will save you from an unnecessarily complex divorce battle. A marital agreement is different from the historical marriage regime, which was not primarily about the effects of divorce, but on the constitution and maintenance of dynastic families or a divorce regime established by the parties as part of the dissolution of their marriage. These agreements can be covered by the Indian Contract Act 1872. Section 10 of the Indian Contracts Act states that agreements must be considered contracts when they are concluded by the free consent of the parties.  Section 23 of the same statute states that a contract may be non-sour if it is immoral or contrary to public policy.  Unlike all other contract laws, no review is necessary, although a minority of courts denounce marriage itself in return. Through a prenup, a spouse can completely waive property rights, support or inheritance, as well as the voting share, and can get nothing for it.
The choice of legal provisions is crucial in the prenups. Contracting parties may decide that the law of the state in which they are married governs both the interpretation of the agreement and the division of property at the time of divorce. In the absence of a legal choice clause, it is the law of the place where the parties divorce, not the law of the state in which they were married, that decides matters of ownership and support. The agreement should be fair and duly recognized by both parties. 4. Winning during the marriage – The income received by each party during the marriage is considered to be the separate property of that spouse. Depending on the mutual understanding between the two parties, they can decide how they want to treat merit during marriage. The 2010 Supreme Court`s Radmacher/Granatino trial case overturned the current legal framework to recognize the changing social and judicial views on the personal autonomy of spouses.   Pre-marriage agreements can now be applied by the courts within their discretion in financial settlement cases under Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, as long as the three-tiered cycling test is completed and is considered fair in the interests of each child in the family. The cyclo-cyclo-maker requests that the courts effectively arrange a marriage agreement freely concluded by each party with a full assessment of its effects, unless, in the present circumstances, it is not fair for the parties to maintain their agreement. The case provided important guidelines, relevant to all marriage agreements that have occurred since 2010.  The advantage of a marriage agreement is that it creates a clear reference to the responsibility that both partners have in the event of divorce or separation.
1) Protection of the rights of children and grandchildren from a previous marriage.